Dell’s carbon neutrality statement is not what it seems


Remember Dell Vice-President Bob Pearson’s comments (subject to this parody) last week about Apple’s new green notebook ads, in which he “wished Apple would be more bold in making a difference rather than making ads”? Well, according to The Wall Street Journal, Dell’s claims about their own “environmentally friendly” PCs were far from the truth. The article, written by Jeffrey Ball, points out that Dell’s “carbon neutrality” has no relation to the actual making of the computers. This means that the resources used to make Dell notebooks and desktops don’t count. Neither does the oil used to transport them. In fact, WSJ went as far as saying that Dell is “only neutralising about 5% of the greenhouse gases that go into the making and use of its products.”

With this news in mind, I believe Dell has to be very careful about criticizing Apple’s environmental efforts without checking their own first. Not only did Bob Pearson make several errors in his original blog post (“It was in one of our regular sustainability meetings that Michael [Dell] challenged us to offer free recycling worldwide for consumers. A big goal and we did it. We hope Apple does the same someday.“), but it turns out he was also wrong about his own company’s environment policies. – r.

[The Wall Street Journal via Gizmodo]


0 Responses to “Dell’s carbon neutrality statement is not what it seems”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

We’re moving…

the green room blog has moved to Our current address will be moved later this month.

TGR Links




Apple Store

Click here to visit the Apple Store through The Green Room.


Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.




%d bloggers like this: